Broad — includes profiles with relevant expertise, even if the connection is somewhat indirect. Good for exploring a wide topic or early-stage projects.
Balanced — includes profiles with a substantive, specific fit. Recommended for most searches.
Selective — only the strongest, most directly relevant matches. Best for specific projects with narrow requirements.
Use this to prevent specific researchers from appearing in the AI's analysis — for example, yourself or someone you already collaborate with.
Excluded profiles are removed before the analysis runs and will not be recommended.
Describe your project — the AI identifies the best-matching researchers from 56 profiles.
These settings are optional — defaults work well for most searches.
Or browse all profiles in the directory below ·
These are potential connections or matches based on AI analysis of researcher profiles and your project description. The analysis is based on brief profile summaries, and results may not always be accurate.
Profiles are not ranked by relevance. Please review each profile personally.
No profiles match your current search or filter criteria.
This will clear all filters and search terms to show all profiles.
Not yet in the directory?
Enter the email address associated with your profile. We will send you a secure, one-time link to make changes.
If your email address is registered in the system, you will receive a link within a few minutes. The link is valid for 1 hour.
Enter a project description, research question, or collaboration need. A focused description helps surface relevant connections.
Your description is compared against the active profile pool — all 56 profiles by default, or a subset if filters are set. Before analysis, each profile’s name, contact details, and affiliation are removed and replaced with a neutral placeholder (R001, R042 …). The analysis draws on research content only — never on who the person is.
Profiles with thematic or methodological overlap are displayed with a short rationale. The analysis draws from brief profile summaries — treat results as a starting point, not a definitive ranking.
During analysis, all identifying information is stripped and replaced with an anonymous code. The AI returns results as codes (e.g. R042); the tool then resolves these back to real profiles to display your name and contact details.
The directory is accessible to anyone with the link. Your research description, methods, and interests are visible along with contact details — this is your professional face to the CogSci community.
Use the Edit your profile link at the bottom of the page to request an edit link. Match quality depends on the richness of your profile text — the AI has no access to your publications or CV.
This directory was developed within the Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, an interdisciplinary organisational unit at the University of Vienna that connected cognitive science researchers across faculties. One of the Hub’s core goals was making this distributed, multi-faculty community visible to itself and to external collaborators.
The Hub concluded its activities at the end of March 2026. This directory was built to continue that function digitally — a persistent, searchable platform with AI-assisted matching to identify connections that informal networks alone might miss.
This tool uses u:ai, the University of Vienna’s own AI infrastructure, operating on servers within the European Union under the University’s institutional data protection policies. No data is processed by external commercial AI providers. The design reflects the data minimisation principle under GDPR: only what is strictly necessary for the analysis is sent.
Sent to the AI: Research field, current research, expertise, research program, methods used, research approach, and collaboration interests — under an anonymous code (e.g. R042), not your name.
Never sent: Your name, email, ORCID, affiliation, faculty, department, and lab. These are only shown in the local directory interface after the AI returns its results.
Two reasons — legal and methodological. Legally, sending names and affiliations is unnecessary when anonymous codes work equally well. Methodologically, anonymization prevents name- or institution-based bias: a researcher’s fit for collaboration should follow from their work, not their position or reputation.
The analysis identifies semantic overlap — shared language, themes, and methods — across 56 profiles. It has no access to publication records, grant histories, or citation networks. Match quality depends on the richness of profile descriptions; sparse entries surface fewer connections. Results may miss relevant matches or occasionally suggest weak ones. They are a structured starting point for human judgment, not a substitute for it.
Write a specific project description rather than a broad topic. For example, “I want to combine eye-tracking and EEG to study attention during aesthetic experiences of contemporary art” will surface more targeted matches than “neuroscience and art.”
You can also use the faculty and department filters to narrow the profile pool before running the analysis, or select a funding call to frame the analysis around a specific programme’s requirements.
Profile data is stored on University of Vienna servers and is not shared with third parties. The AI analysis runs on the University’s own infrastructure (u:ai) within the EU. No profile data is used for AI model training. You can request changes to or removal of your profile at any time.
If your research connects to cognitive science and you would like to be listed, use the Request to be listed link at the bottom of this page. If you are currently listed and would prefer to be removed, contact hubert.pawlowski@univie.ac.at.
Built and maintained by Hubert Pawlowski · University of Vienna.
Originally developed within the Vienna Cognitive Science Hub.
Questions, corrections, or feedback: hubert.pawlowski@univie.ac.at
Not yet in the Cognitive Science Expertise Directory? Fill out this form and we will review your request within a few business days.
Thank you, . We have received your request and will review it within a few business days. You will receive a confirmation email at .
Paste a link to a funding call and we will analyze it automatically. We review all suggestions before adding them.
We will review this and add it if relevant.